
Rene Magritte - "The Art of Conversation"
I’ve noticed an irritating trend in social discourse, and it’s one which seems to get worse the closer your interlocutor is to you in terms of friendship.
First, let’s look at what’s supposed to happen when you meet up with your pal according to the norms of social convention.
Greetings are exchanged, followed by the negotiation of a topic for discussion, after which the dialogue unfolds as a series of turns in which each partaker is alternately speaking then listening. It’s a reciprocal exchange in which points are made, then gaps are left open for responses. In short, it is a two-way democratic process consisting ideally in equal measures of expressing one’s opinion and listening and responding to the opinions of others.
Well, so much for the ideal blueprint for a good chinwag: here’s what usually happens when I try to converse with my Western male friends.
In the following reconstruction, I, the Central Scutinizer, will be represented by the initials ‘CS.’ My interlocutor, an amalgam of said friends and acquaintances, is represented by ‘SB‘, which stands for ‘selfish bastard.’
CS: [tries to open with a greeting, but is blocked by SB who...]
SB: [...launches into long monologue about whatever bee he has in his bonnet, without preliminary greeting or negotiation of topic; does not pause to allow for comments]
CS: [attempts to join conversation with salient point]
SB: [ignores CS's attempt and continues monologue]
CS: [irritated by SB's ill-mannered behaviour tries to derail monologue with witty aside or stupid joke]
SB: [ignores everything and proceeds with monologue; is apparently unconcerned whether CS is interested or has opinions on it]
CS: [by now very pissed off, resolves to barge in aggressively, finally getting a chance to speak. He changes the subject out of spite]
SB : [doesn't even bother to feign interest in new subject or even hide the fact that he is not listening]
CS: [notices this, gets even angrier and resolves to likewise ignore everything SB says]
At this point the conversation breaks down into a kind of shouting match with neither side listening to the other: they might as well be in different rooms.

Well, comedy aside, that is pretty much how conversations go with the vast majority of my Western male friends, and I’m sick of it.
Having a nice chat with a mate just becomes an ugly stressful clash of egos, and should one dare to add more people in to the mix, well, it just gets exponentially worse. Strangely enough, on one such occasion I pointed out to my two acquaintances that nobody was taking a blind bit of notice of what the others were saying, and that we were in reality holding three entirely separate conversations, a fact they indicated they were both conscious of, and yet were not bothered by in the least.
So what’s the cause of all this? Is this rudeness the norm, is it some weird anomaly among ex-patriots, or do I just have an unusually selfish group of friends?

One idea might be that these blokes, living and working in a foreign country with a foreign spouse or partner, get so used to speaking in a kind of reduced idiom that when they get together with their compatriots all those pent-up torrents of native speech burst their banks and come gushing forth, washing away the norms of discourse.
It’s interesting to note that Western females don’t seem to be afflicted with this tedious malady. Neither are the Japanese, who are generally good at turn-taking in conversation (or perhaps it is just their often limited grasp of the language that holds them in check?).
A final observation: I actually find chatting via text message preferable in many cases to actually meeting face to face with these conversation killers, since the very nature of the electronic medium imposes the turn-taking structure that is vital in any meaningful dialogue.
What a sad thing to have to admit.























.jpg)
